|
|
Title du jour:
2006-09-29 - 6:44 p.m.
|
I was talking with a friend. And I started to wonder ... Some people make decisions to not listen to music due to the artist's lifestyle or choices. Where can/should you draw the line? (And here's where I'm kinda glad that I don't have comments or a guestbook. It's more of a "think about it" question than "I really want an answer" question). If someone lives an "alternative lifestyle," do you: Am I too permissive in my decisions on how I deal with this? My friends are my friends because I like them as people, not because they make all the decisions that I would. I am more than aware that not everyone has the same moral code that I have. I can recognize talent and worthwhile-ity in people regardless of lifestyle. Do I hold too much to "Hate the sin, but love the sinner?" Should I be more stringent? Should I start avoiding people that I know don't live to what I believe that they could/should? I don't think I should. I could be wrong. Michael says that I am Christ-like in my acceptance of people. Yes, everyone sins. Everyone can repent. Everyone has different obstacles in their lives. I'm not going to say that because So-and-so did one thing that I can't hang out with them (well, depending on some things -- I'll give people a chance with trust. Trust is harder for me to give than acceptance, really.) I have a friend who is bisexual. I don't know if she acts upon her desires. Would I trust her to watch my kids? Yes. Now that I've written all this (such a nice place to vent and to think things through), I'm not feeling bad about my choice. I know that some people will think that I'm too permissive. Some will think that I'm far too conservative and straight-laced. I'm feeling like I'm comfortable with my decision. In other news, I need to give the kiddos a bath and get them ready for bed. (Like that's new news! Ha!)
![]() In which I use "wither the fries" a few times - 2006-10-12
|